Real benchmark data — not marketing claims
Same 5 developer tasks. Real API calls. Measured cost and quality.
DeepSeek V3 via Dragonfly: $0.008 vs Claude Opus 4.6: $0.330
Price per token is meaningless without quality. Token Efficiency = Quality Score ÷ Cost — it measures how much useful output you get per dollar spent.
A model that scores 4.4/5 for $0.008 is dramatically more efficient than one scoring 4.9/5 for $0.33 — you get 90% of the quality at 2% of the cost.
DeepSeek V3 via Dragonfly
Quality: 4.4/5 · 5 tasks: $0.008
550
efficiency score
Kimi K2 via Dragonfly
Quality: 4.3/5 · 5 tasks: $0.010
430
efficiency score
Qwen 3 235B via Dragonfly
Quality: 4.3/5 · 5 tasks: $0.015
287
efficiency score
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
Quality: 4.9/5 · 5 tasks: $0.330
15
efficiency score
DeepSeek V3
$0.0014
Kimi K2
$0.0011
Qwen 3 235B
$0.0030
Claude Opus 4.6
$0.052
DeepSeek V3
$0.0019
Kimi K2
$0.0018
Qwen 3 235B
$0.0027
Claude Opus 4.6
$0.093
DeepSeek V3
$0.0020
Kimi K2
$0.0029
Qwen 3 235B
$0.0043
Claude Opus 4.6
$0.069
DeepSeek V3
$0.0003
Kimi K2
$0.0006
Qwen 3 235B
$0.0006
Claude Opus 4.6
$0.043
DeepSeek V3
$0.0023
Kimi K2
$0.0039
Qwen 3 235B
$0.0042
Claude Opus 4.6
$0.072
98%
Cost reduction vs Claude Opus 4.6
90%
Quality retention (4.4 vs 4.9)
<1¢
Total cost for 5 real dev tasks
Switch to Dragonfly. Same quality. 37x the efficiency.